Comment: It's not about the cost of labour
By David Birnbaum | 4 July 2012
![]() |
Cost doesn't necessarily correlate with market share |
The cost of labour is just one element that needs to be taken into account when it comes to evaluating supplier factories and countries. And, as David Birnbaum shows here, cost doesn't necessarily correlate with market share.
A worker in Bangladesh...
- is paid, at most $75 per month;
- is not particularly efficient, requires about 18 minutes to produce one man's/woman's pair of denim jeans, which works out to 2400 jeans per annum.
- The average FOB price of a made-in-Bangladesh jeans is $7.99.
- Worker's output = $19,165.35
- Worker's annual wage = $900
- Worker produces 21.3 times his wage
A worker in the US...
- is paid about $7 per hour;
- is much more efficient than the worker in Bangladesh, requiring about 14 minutes to produce one man's/woman's pair of denim jeans, which works out to a per annum figure of 3086 jeans.
- The average ex-factory price of a made-in-US jean is $25 (author's estimate).
- The worker's output = $77,142.86
- Worker's annual wage = $15,120
- Worker produces 5.1 times his wage
All of which explains why denim jeans are produced in Bangladesh rather than the United States.
Now try this.
A worker in China...
- is paid about $316 per month;
- is reasonably efficient, requiring about 14 minutes to produce one man's/woman's pair of denim jeans, which works out to a per annum figure 2880 jeans.
- The average FOB price of a made-in-China jean is $8.79.
- Worker's output = $25,304.14
- Worker's annual wage = $3792
- Worker produces 6.67 times his wage
A worker in Mexico...
- is paid about $540 per month;
- when well-trained can be extremely efficient, requiring about 12 minutes to produce one man's/woman's pair of denim jeans, which works out to, a per annum figure 3600 jeans.
- The average FOB price of a made-in-Mexico jean is $9.24.
- Worker's output = $33,251.76
- Worker's annual wage = $6480
- Worker produces 5.13 times his wage
All of which explains why denim jeans are produced in Bangladesh rather than China or Mexico.
Now here comes the kicker:
US market share...
- China: 28.9%
- Mexico: 29.6%
- Bangladesh: 6.4%
Since it was published, this article has sparked a debate on just-style about labour costs in Bangladesh. Click on the links below to read the follow-up comments.
Comment: Why it is all about the cost of labour!
Comment: Caught in the cost of labour trap
David Birnbaum is the author of The Birnbaum Report, a monthly newsletter for garment industry professionals. Each issue analyses in-depth US garment imports of four major products from 21 countries, as well as ancillary data such as currency fluctuations, China quota premiums and clearance rates. Click here to visit David's website.
Sectors: Apparel, Manufacturing, Retail, Sourcing
View next/previous articles
5 Jul 2012 -
Currently reading -
Comment: It's not about the cost of labour
4 Jul 2012 -
4 Jul 2012 -
Read more on this hot issue
A debate about the real wage cost of clothing that has been running on just-style over the past week started with a look at labour costs in Bangladesh, asked why wages in the country remain so low, and offered some suggestions to help apparel sourcing companies calculate - and implement - a living wage.












There is currently 1 comment on this article
Sorry.. need to really comment on this one..
It is not about cost of labour.. it is about trade rule, lead time, and a lot of stuff..
Please look into NAFTA. Why Mexico has such a huge share? because they have duty saving for all cotton base jean. (It is not all sun and shinny for mexico supplier tho.. they have yarn forward rules.. so they need to use USA Cotton, which is higher price than most other factory.)
You loosely uses jean as a commodity. Have you really look at the types of Jean that is made in Mexico, China, and BD? What segment of jean does each of these market specialised in? You think buyer can just shift their production?
And if you turn back the clock 3 to 5 years back when RMB hasn't appreciated 33% . China inclusive of its efficiency beats out BD. At that time, China owns the world!
In the closing, you use market share as a proof that it is not just about cost of labour. Well.. this is one of the worst proof you can give.
Take Mexico out because they have NAFTA (but in 3 year time, Mexico will probably be less and we are going to see more CAFTA nation on the list for US market. But you bet the owner of the CAFTA factory are the same supplier in Mexico tho).
China is going down.. going probably to Vietnam betting on TPP for US market. going to Cambodia/Burma for EU market.
BD is on the rise for sure.
India has huge domestic market so no go.
Indonesia is hot now. Philippine is suddenly back on the radar.
Moving production doesn't happen on the same season. (Buying is still at 6 month long process. 15 week for quotation and development and add another after 16 to 19 week for overseas production). So using current market share as a proof of it isn't about cost of labour is kinda bad.
Calbear said at 5:12 am, July 21, 2012
Reply to this comment