US: Court classifies certain football items as apparel
A court in the US has ruled that certain items worn for American football should be classified as apparel, rather than sports equipment, for import duty purposes.
The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled last week that certain football jerseys, pants and girdles – designed to be worn with protective pads, but not containing them – must be considered as apparel.
The ruling upheld the Court of International Trade’s previous classification of pants as liable to 14.9% duty, and jerseys as liable to 32% duty.
It also declared that girdles should more appropriately be liable to 14.9% duty, dismissing the plaintiff’s arguments that the items should be treated on a duty-free basis.
The ruling of the court said the items could not meet duty-free requirements because, although they were designed to be worn with padding, they did not come bundled with them, leaving the padding as entirely separate items.
“The fact that these items have a specialised use does not make them lose their character as articles of apparel, which also prevents them from being classified as parts or accessories of sports equipment,” the court said.
- Gap and H&M back Myanmar path to labour reform
- Levi Strauss raises the bar on sustainability
- Clarity on competition law and living wages
- Can technology shape a sustainable fashion future?
- Frustrations come to the fore in Bangladesh
- Talks progressing on Myanmar minimum wage
- Fast Retailing supplier continues strike talks
- Hugo Boss in talks over supplier labour claims
- US trade agenda back on track
- H&M warns of "negative" impact from dollar
- Global market review of lingerie - forecasts to 2020
- World Textile and Apparel Trade and Production Trends: The EU - May 2015
- Wool in the 21st Century: new prospects for a familiar fibre
- Apparel Retail: Top 5 Emerging Markets Industry Guide
- Myanmar's Garment Sector - Opportunities & Challenges in 2015