CHINA: Hazardous chemicals found in children’s wear
Hazardous chemicals have been found in children's clothing
The report from Greenpeace East Asia covered tests on 82 items sold by 12 brands, also including American Apparel, Gap, Primark and Nike, and detected the presence of what the organisation called “hazardous, potentially hormone-disrupting chemicals”.
Bought last May and June from flagship stores or authorised retailers in 25 countries or regions around the world, the items were made in at least 12 different countries or regions, and one-third of them in China.
NPE was found in 61% of the samples, while more than 94% of those with plastisol prints were found to contain phthalates - with every brand tested found to have some items with “hazardous” chemicals.
These included an Adidas swimsuit claimed to have PFOA levels higher than on the company’s own Restricted Substance List and a Primark children’s T-shirt with 110,000mg/kg of phthalates.
Greenpeace said “high” levels of NPEs were also found in products made by Burberry, Adidas and Disney.
The organisation is calling on the Chinese government to help stop the use of hazardous chemicals in the textile industry, issuing a chemical blacklist to be acted upon immediately.
“This is a nightmare for parents everywhere looking to buy safe clothes for their children,” said Chih An Lee, detox campaigner at Greenpeace East Asia.
“These chemicals are in everything, from exclusive luxury designs to affordable fashion, and from T-shirts to shoes.
“What’s worse, they are accumulating in our waterways, especially China’s rivers and oceans, leaving a long-lasting environmental mess for our future generations.”
It recently emerged that outdoor jackets and gloves sold in Germany by brands including The North Face, Jack Wolfskin,Patagonia and Adidas contained chemicals that are hazardous to the environment and can pose long-term risks to human health.
And the discovery of a huge area of polluted “black water” off the Chinese coast has been blamed on waste water from local dyeing and finishing factories.
Greenpeace says the findings reinforce the need for big brands to urgently take steps to detox their products and supply chains. Many have already joined the group's Detox campaign, which commits them to eliminate all hazardous chemicals from their supply chains by 2020.
An interactive databank with intelligence on the major apparel sourcing countries
Burberry Group plc (BRBY) - Financial and Strategic SWOT Analysis Review provides you an in-depth strategic SWOT analysis of the company’s businesses and operations. The profile has been compiled by G...
Nike believes that footwear manufactured using its Flyknit fabric, which was initially launched in 2012, will be one of its growth drivers going forward. Initially launched in running footwear, Nike h...
Nike in Vietnam aims to strengthen its position as the top producer of Nike shoes. Cheap labour costs play the most important role, and the company is expected to control expenditure carefully to stay...
BRS Nike Taiwan continued its strong marketing presence in 2013. The company will continue to position its products to consumers as being high-quality, reliable and performance-driven through the spon...
- Yuan devaluation impact mixed for garment firms
- Will Vietnam struggle with impending trade deals?
- China devaluation: what’s the big deal?
- The new age of disruption on apparel production
- Gap bullish on China growth opportunities
- US Q2 in brief: Guess, PVH, Abercrombie & Fitch
- Gap restructuring weighs on Q2 as profit falls 34%
- Luen Thai to continue investment in Vietnam
- Ralph Lauren debuts biometic smart shirt
- China market woes could hit consumer spending
- Global Database of the Top 1000 Apparel Producers - Company Names, Financial Performance, and Contact Details
- Ethiopia – the emerging textile and clothing industry
- Myanmar's Garment Sector in 2015 - now with updated members' directory
- Global market review of lingerie - forecasts to 2020
- Global market review of swimwear - forecasts to 2019