MEXICO: New tax law poses challenges to maquilas
Changes in Mexican tax law that came into effect on 1 January pose "significant challenges" to maquila operations, which include many textile and apparel manufacturers.
An update from international trade law firm Sandler, Travis & Rosenberg says that under the new rules Mexican maquiladoras are now required to pay value-added tax on their imports.
The law also eliminated some tax breaks for maquilas - who are thought to account for around 85% of Mexico's manufacturing exports - and established strict new requirements for such factories to qualify for others.
The statutory changes were enacted to combat what Mexican tax authorities believe was an abuse by maquiladoras of the IMMEX tax breaks, which provided for VAT-free temporary imports of goods, parts and components, as well as machinery and equipment; a lower VAT (11%) in Mexico's border states; flat income and corporate tax rates; and "permanent establishment" protection.
Most significantly, the new law eliminated the VAT exemption for temporary imports of goods, machinery and equipment, and increased the VAT in the border states from 11% to 16%. As a result, imported goods are now subject to VAT payment at the moment of import and will be accredited a set-off only after the maquila exports the final goods from Mexico, which could create a difficult cash-flow problem.
However, the Mexican government will allow for a 100% VAT tax credit at import and return any VAT payments within 10-20 days if the maquila obtains certification through the Mexican tax authority.
The law includes other notable changes as well. First, the new definition of maquilas for income tax law purposes requires all imported goods to be exported, physically or virtually.
Second, revenue associated with production must be derived solely from maquila activities, a requirement that is problematic for maquilas whose goods are sold domestically in addition to being exported.
Third, a foreign resident must own at least 30% of the machinery and equipment used in the maquila and cannot simply transfer those assets to its books to meet this requirement.
Fourth, Mexico will no longer accept transfer pricing studies to demonstrate arms-length transactions required for "permanent establishment" protection. Instead, companies must use a safe harbor or create an advanced price agreement (APA) with the Mexican tax authority.
And fifth, the partial exemption from the income tax has been eliminated, subjecting maquilas to the corporate tax rate of 30%.
The law firm advises affected companies to take a close look at how the new law will impact their operations and make the changes necessary to continue receiving available tax benefits.
An interactive databank with intelligence on the major apparel sourcing countries
- Can Gap maintain its momentum minus Larsson?
- Private label sourcing faces range of pressures
- What clothing could the TPP X-basket contain?
- The Flanarant: TPP – now the real fight starts
- Patagonia's CSR commitments re-shaping the sector
- Update: Negotiators agree landmark TPP trade deal
- H&M falling behind on Bangladesh factory safety?
- New CEO may focus on Ralph Lauren supply chain
- Nike collaborates on low-impact textile challenge
- Unions agree proposed Cambodia minimum wage
- Wearable technology: The future market potential for smart garments and e-textiles
- Global Database of the Top 1000 Apparel Producers - Company Names, Financial Performance, and Contact Details
- Myanmar's Garment Sector in 2015 - now with updated members' directory
- Outdoor performance apparel: peaks, valleys, and green fields
- Global market review of lingerie - forecasts to 2020