Blog: A Big Mac and fries?
Leonie Barrie | 11 July 2005
McDonald’s says its decision to draft in celebrity designers to re-vamp its restaurant workers’ uniforms is intended to “capture that spirit of being forever young,” with a hip-hop look that they’ll want to continue to wear to the club when they’ve finished their shifts. I’ve long since left my clubbing days behind me, but I do know that work clothes – in any shape or form, let alone a McDonald’s uniform – would be the last thing I’d want to wear out on the town.
Having a well-known name to design a workplace uniform is no guarantee of success. As with anything in life, you’ll never satisfy all of the people all of the time. Airlines are probably one of the biggest culprits for jumping on the celebrity designer bandwagon – and if you’ve ever taken the time to ask flight attendants about their garb you’ll realise most have at least one criticism to level at the person responsible. One of the biggest oversights of all is the fact these are work clothes – and as such they have a completely different function to fulfill than everyday attire.
McDonald’s would also seem to be making a big mistake by assuming that the majority of its 600,000 US employees are teenagers. An older person is going to feel ridiculous dressed in a trendy, active design. There’s also the reverse to consider. Will any negative connotations from designing the McDonald’s uniform rub off on an upscale brand such as Ralph Lauren, one of the designer names being weighed up?
“Clothes may make the man,” as the saying goes, but they contribute very little when it come to buying fast food hamburgers. The Brand Keys Customer Loyalty Index estimates that the uniforms employees wear make a 0.005 per cent contribution to loyalty and profitability. That’s one-half of one per cent. A ‘clean’ uniform makes closer to a 1 per cent contribution. McDonald's will have to sell an awful lot of hamburgers to make up for the cost of half a million new uniforms.
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- Four steps to reduce product defects
- EU eyes mandatory due diligence for apparel supply
- Geo-political uncertainty and how to survive it
- US Q4 in brief – Oxford Industries, Shoe Carnival
- H&M, VF Corp and Levi among most ethical companies
- Sears has "substantial doubt" of future
- Vietnam limits hazardous chemicals in apparel
- Target unveils "ambitious" store re-design plans
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective