Blog: At last a decision on Sri Lanka’s GSP+
Leonie Barrie | 18 December 2009
Having lived for the past couple of months with the threat of the EU’s withdrawal of its GSP+ trade benefits, at least Sri Lanka’s apparel makers now know where they stand.
While the decision may not have been the one they hoped for, some degree of uncertainty has at least been lifted after the EC this week made the – not entirely unexpected – recommendation to take away the country’s duty-free concessions.
The judgement was in retaliation for alleged human rights abuses during the final stages of Sri Lanka’s civil war, but was also exacerbated by the government’s stubborn refusal to cooperate with the Commission’s subsequent investigation.
The decision will clearly come as a blow to the local industry. Apparel exporters have already admitted that business has moved away from the Indian Ocean island on the basis of uncertainty alone, while international buyers who continue to source there are asking local factories to absorb the cost of the new duties at a time when margins are already wafer-thin.
Some estimates suggest this could amount to tens of millions of euros, since most garments will revert back to 9.6% duties when landed in Europe.
But it is not all doom and gloom. Sri Lanka’s strengths lie in garments like bras, on which the EU will charge duty of just 5.2%. And around a third of the garments it sends to Europe don’t qualify for duty-free entry at all.
The EU won’t remove GSP+ duty-free concessions until June 2010 at the earliest – so no garments currently in production or under negotiation will have their duty concession withdrawn.
And there’s even a slim chance that the EU Member Council, which has two months to vote on the EC’s proposal, might decide to throw the recommendation out after all.
Intriguingly, the wording of the EC’s decision document also stresses the “temporary” nature of the withdrawal. Which seems to offer a glimmer of hope that the decision might even be reviewed at some point in the current beneficiary period, which runs until 31 December 2011.
And according to local reports the Sri Lankan authorities have indicated their willingness to cooperate with the EU on retaining the scheme.
Which begs the question: why didn’t they agree to this in the first place to avoid all the subsequent heartache? Maybe fears ahead of the presidential elections on 26 January were the catalyst that’s needed.
Continuing our look at what lies ahead for the apparel industry and its supply chain in 2017, the panel of industry experts consulted by just-style last week tackled likely shifts in the sourcing land...
This week our focus turns to first thoughts from a panel of industry experts consulted by just-style on the challenges and opportunities likely to face the apparel supply chain in 2017, with prospects...
Welcome back after the holiday break, and from the team here at just-style I’d like to wish all our readers a happy and prosperous New Year....
Apparel sourcing is a complex process built on a mix of location, logistics, lead-time, price, compliance, risk and reliability. And it's in a constant state of flux as retailers, brands and manufactu...
- $1.7bn package to boost Pakistan clothing exports
- Outlook 2017 – What next for apparel sourcing?
- Mexico riots hit apparel retailers and shipments
- Is China about to burst its apparel trade bubble?
- Trump and the apparel industry – Infographic
- MAS Holdings planning second industrial park
- Cambodia clothing exports at risk from Brexit
- JC Penney latest retailer to shutter stores?
- Aéropostale to reopen 500 stores across the US
- Apparel brands urge Bangladesh PM to address wages
- Global apparel markets: product developments and innovations, October 2016
- Anti-odour clothing: fresh fashion for an active lifestyle
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective