Blog: Better the devil you know
Leonie Barrie | 9 July 2007
Europe's temporary quotas against ten categories of clothing and textiles from China are due to be lifted at the end of 2007, and already there are rumblings of dissent from some of the EU’s more protectionist quarters about extending the date back to 2008. But although it’s not clear-cut what will actually happen at the end of this year, it’s also unlikely that true free trade between Europe and China will be unleashed.
The consensus from those in the know, however, is that if restrictions are going to continue in some form or another, then there are worse things than quotas for the industry to contend with. Clothesource’s Mike Flanagan suggests these include anti-dumping rules – and all manner of other ‘Trade Defence Instruments’.
But the EU and its trade commissioner Peter Mandelson don’t like quotas, so it’s a fair bet they’d prefer to hit China for trade abuses rather than discriminate through safeguards. And as Emma Ormond, international trade consultant at PriceWaterhouseCoopers told delegates at this year’s Prime Source Forum, there is a precedent in footwear [last year, anti-dumping duties were imposed on leather footwear imports into the EU from China and Vietnam] and it’s more than likely a new anti-dumping investigation opened on any category will go through.
Which means apparel importers could be stuck between a rock and a hard place if they don’t take action soon: between quotas on the one hand, perhaps extended to new categories, and anti-dumping duties on the other. All of which leads to uncertainty.
So what can European retailers, importers and suppliers do if they want to avert a repeat of 2005’s ‘bra wars’ fiasco? The advice seems to be get involved and be prepared. Start lobbying politicians, fight for a lower anti-dumping rate than the competition, and be ready to counter any investigations that are initiated. Again there is a precedent here in footwear, where anti-dumping duties were lower than expected and imposed for just two years.
The real danger lies in doing nothing; if companies don’t react now, the European Commission will think they don’t care.
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
- Digitalisation and data to disrupt supply chains
- EU eyes mandatory due diligence for apparel supply
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Geo-political uncertainty and how to survive it
- Li & Fung forms supply chain partnership with PVH
- US Q4 in brief – G-III Apparel, Finish Line
- Big data to help US firms improve clothing fit
- Levi Strauss and ILO probe Cambodia factory death
- Labour rights risk Bangladesh EU trade benefits?
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack