Blog: Children's clothing with a conscience
Leonie Barrie | 6 June 2011
It's hard not to question the ulterior motives of the UK retailers who have put their names to new 'good practice' guidelines for stores selling children's clothing. Indeed, of the nine high street chains and supermarkets claiming to "take our responsibilities seriously" when it comes to making sure they don't sell sexy or exploitative clothing for the under-12s, five have already been hauled over the coals in recent years for selling inappropriate garments for kids.
Public outcries forced supermarket retailer Asda to withdraw padded bras for children, while Marks & Spencer was criticised for selling a crop top that looked like a bra for girls as young as six. Concerns have also been levelled at padded bras on sale at Tesco, and online at Next and Peacocks.
Today's code of conduct coincides with the launch of a government review into children's sexualisation, which recommends the retail industry signs up to new guidelines that checks and challenges the design, buying, display and marketing of clothes for children. Cynically, it's hard not to believe the two are connected. So perhaps it's the threat of criticism and possible new restrictions resulting from this investigation that has really pricked the retailers' collective conscience.
And there's also something disheartening about the fact that not only has it taken a government review to spur retailers into issuing advice, but that that advice has to state what, surely, should be commonsense.
So we're told "fabrics and cuts should provide for modesty," "slogans and imagery must be age appropriate and without...suggestive, demeaning, derogative or political material," "the length of skirts and neck-lines need to be considered," thongs are not appropriate," "no mention should be made of 'enhancement' or 'under-wiring' in any children's [bra] ranges," "underwear should never be modelled on children."
But then, as the mistakes of the past show all too clearly, unsuitable designs do make it all the way to production and retailing without being spotted. Only time will tell if the new guidelines make a real difference.
Some of just-style’s more eagle-eyed readers might have noticed a small change to the menu bar on the homepage: the addition of the word re:source. Yes it might be a small change – but it marks the co...
Over the past week just-style has continued to try to unravel the potential ramifications of Donald Trump’s election as the next president of the United States....
One event dominated the international airwaves last week, and on just-style too we took a closer look at the surprise election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States....
As the Brexit roller-coaster continues to twist and turn, and the US presidential election campaign nears its unpredictable and possibly protectionist end, there's no doubt these events – and the perc...
- Steps to piloting living wage in garment factories
- US apparel retailers' November 2016 sales roundup
- Planning is key to an effective inventory strategy
- Why do modern robotics elude sportswear makers?
- Software for financial planning and operations
- Esquel efficiency drive continues to boost brands
- US Q3 in brief – Genesco, G-III Apparel, Express
- Columbia waterproof jacket first made without PFCs
- Myanmar garment industry "lacking labour rights"
- EU urged to adopt roadmap for Sri Lanka GSP+ bid
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- Footwear Top 5 Emerging Markets Industry Guide_2016
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022
- Global apparel markets: product developments and innovations, October 2016
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack