Blog: Children's clothing with a conscience
Leonie Barrie | 6 June 2011
It's hard not to question the ulterior motives of the UK retailers who have put their names to new 'good practice' guidelines for stores selling children's clothing. Indeed, of the nine high street chains and supermarkets claiming to "take our responsibilities seriously" when it comes to making sure they don't sell sexy or exploitative clothing for the under-12s, five have already been hauled over the coals in recent years for selling inappropriate garments for kids.
Public outcries forced supermarket retailer Asda to withdraw padded bras for children, while Marks & Spencer was criticised for selling a crop top that looked like a bra for girls as young as six. Concerns have also been levelled at padded bras on sale at Tesco, and online at Next and Peacocks.
Today's code of conduct coincides with the launch of a government review into children's sexualisation, which recommends the retail industry signs up to new guidelines that checks and challenges the design, buying, display and marketing of clothes for children. Cynically, it's hard not to believe the two are connected. So perhaps it's the threat of criticism and possible new restrictions resulting from this investigation that has really pricked the retailers' collective conscience.
And there's also something disheartening about the fact that not only has it taken a government review to spur retailers into issuing advice, but that that advice has to state what, surely, should be commonsense.
So we're told "fabrics and cuts should provide for modesty," "slogans and imagery must be age appropriate and without...suggestive, demeaning, derogative or political material," "the length of skirts and neck-lines need to be considered," thongs are not appropriate," "no mention should be made of 'enhancement' or 'under-wiring' in any children's [bra] ranges," "underwear should never be modelled on children."
But then, as the mistakes of the past show all too clearly, unsuitable designs do make it all the way to production and retailing without being spotted. Only time will tell if the new guidelines make a real difference.
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
- Digitalisation and data to disrupt supply chains
- EU eyes mandatory due diligence for apparel supply
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Geo-political uncertainty and how to survive it
- Li & Fung forms supply chain partnership with PVH
- US Q4 in brief – Finish Line, Oxford Industries
- Big data to help US firms improve clothing fit
- Levi Strauss and ILO probe Cambodia factory death
- Sustainable fashion app to help shopping decisions
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing