Blog: Design protection a double-edged sword?
Leonie Barrie | 20 August 2007
While plans to protect fashion designs from cheap copies and knockoffs for the first time might seem like a good idea on paper, the reality is more like trying to answer the question “How long is a piece of string.”
US lawmakers want the Design Piracy Prohibition Act to extend current copyright protection – which already covers things like logos, lettering or an identifying mark such as embroidery – to the entire design of a garment. But their plans seem to have been drawn up without any comprehension of the industry they’re trying to protect.
It’s a well-known fact that all designers, whether at the top or bottom ends of the market, are all feeding from the same inspirations as they attempt to tap into the mood of consumers, be it long-term colour and fabric forecasts or dipping into everything from the art world to the ‘street’ in an attempt to hit the right emotional temperature.
So at what point does one designer start a trend that inspires another? Or when does a copy become a homage? All designs are, to a large extent, simply an evolution of what’s gone before.
And what about the logistics and enforcement of the law? At what point does a garment be copyrightable – sketched on a design pad, at first sample, or in the retail store? And who is going to check the millions of garments designed each year for copyright?
Designers like to argue that knockoffs eat into sales, tarnish a brand, and make it more difficult for young designers to make their mark. But don’t copies also make the originals more widely known and increase the value of the brand name versions? And doesn’t the lack of copyright protection on fashion designs mean to a certain extent that designers need to be more innovative more often to stimulate sales?
It’s proving difficult enough to enforce current laws that protect logos or ornamentation, so what are the real chances of protecting the designs themselves?
Increasing competition for garment sourcing contracts is seeing China not only being challenged by other countries in Asia, but by sub-Saharan African and even Russian suppliers too. And it is pushing...
The monthly minimum wage for workers in Cambodia's textile, garment and footwear sector is set to rise to $153 from January next year, following a vote on the issue last week. The increase marks a ris...
The results of two highly-anticipated initiatives in the sportswear sphere were revealed last week: the launch of Under Armour’s new UAS lifestyle brand and the first pair of running shoes created at ...
The recent bankruptcy of South Korea's Hanjin Shipping, the world's seventh-largest container shipper, at the end of August, has left billions of dollars worth of merchandise in limbo, leaving the fal...
- Will new Vietnam wage hinder competitiveness?
- Digitisation to drive new apparel-making models
- Fashion fit for the future – strategies for speed
- Under Armour Lighthouse will disrupt production
- How TAL Apparel is staying ahead of the game
- Gap to shutter all UK Banana Republic stores
- MAS Holdings shares commitment to sustainability
- M&S "unappealing" clothing a barrier to growth
- Modern Slavery Act boosts supply chain engagement
- Bangladesh tops China as lead cotton importer
- Africa-Med strategic sourcing review – comparing East Africa, North Africa and Turkey
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Apparel (GLOBAL) - Industry Report
- Global Sports and Fitness Wear Market 2016-2020