Blog: Leonie BarrieFootwear fury

Leonie Barrie | 9 October 2006

In European Union circles, apathy seems to count for more than action. Take last week’s voting on the introduction of anti-dumping duties on footwear imports from China and Vietnam. Even though a majority of 12 EU member states voted against the Commission’s proposals – and just nine voted in favour of them – it was still passed.

Why? Because four other member states abstained from the voting, and under EU rules, an abstention is considered a vote in favour of the Commission’s proposal. Therefore, the Commissions recommendations were carried on a 13 (9 Yes + 4 Abstentions) to 12 vote. So the footwear industry will now be hounded for the next two years by a ruling that no-one really wanted in the first place. The same thing happened when voting took place to introduce preliminary anti-dumping duties earlier this year. Surely it’s a case of bureaucracy gone barmy?

EU: China, Vietnam, trade groups slam shoe tariffs


Ethiopia unrest a sourcing risk?

Fashion retailer H&M and UK based glove and leather manufacturer Pittards both say they are monitoring the situation in Ethiopia closely after the country's government declared a state of emergency af...


Asia facing up to increased competition

Increasing competition for garment sourcing contracts is seeing China not only being challenged by other countries in Asia, but by sub-Saharan African and even Russian suppliers too. And it is pushing...


Cambodia raises garment worker wages

The monthly minimum wage for workers in Cambodia's textile, garment and footwear sector is set to rise to $153 from January next year, following a vote on the issue last week. The increase marks a ris...


Sportswear initiatives start to take shape

The results of two highly-anticipated initiatives in the sportswear sphere were revealed last week: the launch of Under Armour’s new UAS lifestyle brand and the first pair of running shoes created at ...

just-style homepage

Forgot your password?