Blog: Leonie BarrieFootwear fury

Leonie Barrie | 9 October 2006

In European Union circles, apathy seems to count for more than action. Take last week’s voting on the introduction of anti-dumping duties on footwear imports from China and Vietnam. Even though a majority of 12 EU member states voted against the Commission’s proposals – and just nine voted in favour of them – it was still passed.

Why? Because four other member states abstained from the voting, and under EU rules, an abstention is considered a vote in favour of the Commission’s proposal. Therefore, the Commissions recommendations were carried on a 13 (9 Yes + 4 Abstentions) to 12 vote. So the footwear industry will now be hounded for the next two years by a ruling that no-one really wanted in the first place. The same thing happened when voting took place to introduce preliminary anti-dumping duties earlier this year. Surely it’s a case of bureaucracy gone barmy?

EU: China, Vietnam, trade groups slam shoe tariffs


BLOG

A new re:source from just-style

Some of just-style’s more eagle-eyed readers might have noticed a small change to the menu bar on the homepage: the addition of the word re:source. Yes it might be a small change – but it marks the co...

BLOG

Trump's trade ramifications continue to unravel

Over the past week just-style has continued to try to unravel the potential ramifications of Donald Trump’s election as the next president of the United States....

BLOG

What's in store following Trump's election?

One event dominated the international airwaves last week, and on just-style too we took a closer look at the surprise election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States....

BLOG

Political shadow over apparel supply chain

As the Brexit roller-coaster continues to twist and turn, and the US presidential election campaign nears its unpredictable and possibly protectionist end, there's no doubt these events – and the perc...

just-style homepage



Forgot your password?