Blog: GSP+ fears loom
Leonie Barrie | 22 October 2008
By refusing a European Union investigation into the country’s alleged human rights abuses, the Sri Lankan government has effectively sounded the death knell for an extension to the GSP+ trade scheme.
The trade concession, which comes to the end of a three-year term in December, has almost single-handedly helped Sri Lanka's garment sector grow to a US$3bn a year industry. Garments account for 65% of Sri Lanka’s exports to the EU, using the GSP+ - and without the trade preference, export duties will rise from zero to 8%-10%.
To offset concerns of leading international buyers about possible price rises, the government says it will provide $150m to industry in 2009 to offset any potential shocks from losing the preference. But this relief is only temporary, and may well end up giving retailers and importers a year in which to find other, cheaper sources of supply in neighbouring countries like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia and the Philippines.
Some buyers have already asked garment factories to absorb the duty component partially or in total – highlighting the fact that higher manufacturing costs in Sri Lanka have already made profit margins wafer thin and there is little room for any further concessions.
Ironically, higher production costs are in part due to the industry’s focus on better labour standards. The Garments without Guilt campaign was introduced to give the Indian Ocean island an edge as an ethical producer in a crowded international market. But this image has perhaps been irreparably damaged by the actions of its own government which, through its refusal to be monitored, suggests the welfare of its citizens is not now as high on its agenda as it claims.
The EU’s decision at the end of this month may also detrimentally influence the industry’s chances of getting support from a US programme similar to the EU’s GSP+.
Of course there’s also the argument that a country should not always depend on trade concessions for its competitive advantage. And indeed, investments in local fabric and trimmings facilities means Sri Lanka is now in a much stronger vertical position than it was when the GSP+ status was first granted in 2005.
But when retailers are fearful for their own businesses, and when cutting margins and lowering inventories is a key to their survival, losing a concession that keeps prices down couldn’t have come at a worse time.
Some of just-style’s more eagle-eyed readers might have noticed a small change to the menu bar on the homepage: the addition of the word re:source. Yes it might be a small change – but it marks the co...
Over the past week just-style has continued to try to unravel the potential ramifications of Donald Trump’s election as the next president of the United States....
One event dominated the international airwaves last week, and on just-style too we took a closer look at the surprise election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States....
As the Brexit roller-coaster continues to twist and turn, and the US presidential election campaign nears its unpredictable and possibly protectionist end, there's no doubt these events – and the perc...
- Steps to piloting living wage in garment factories
- How to ensure sustainability is more than a slogan
- US apparel retailers' November 2016 sales roundup
- Trump blows the case for Brexit out of the water
- Why do modern robotics elude sportswear makers?
- Esquel efficiency drive continues to boost brands
- Taiwan textile maker investing in first US plant
- US Q3 in brief – Sears, Vince Holding, Genesco
- Myanmar garment industry "lacking labour rights"
- Outdoor apparel sector set for double-digit growth