Blog: Luxuries, just less of them
Leonie Barrie | 17 October 2008
Luxury goods have always been seen to be pretty much impervious to economic ups and downs, but here’s a worrying headline that challenges this conventional wisdom: “In the current economy, the highest-income affluents have cut their spending the most.”
What’s probably the most up-to-date consumer survey to reflect the impact of the stock market implosion earlier this month shows wealthier customers are changing their lifestyles and shopping behaviour to such an extent that they can’t be relied upon to shore up business through the current economic crisis.
The survey by Unity Marketing was carried out from 3-8 October while the US stock market was in free fall. It found that ultra-affluents with incomes of $250,000 and above – the top 2% of US households – have cut their spending on luxuries by nearly 20%.
This compares with a 10% cut in spending by luxury consumers with incomes from $100,000 to $249,999 in the first three quarters of 2008.
So why is the impact of this downturn different? Well this time the ultra-affluents are being hit in the source of their wealth: the value of their homes and their stock portfolios.
Instead they’re saving money by shopping more strategically, shopping less frequently, and cutting their fashion spending by visiting sales, outlets, and opting for less premium brands.
But of course it’s not all doom-and-gloom. They are still indulging in their favourite luxury brands, albeit buying more selectively. Instead of splurging on a whole new outfit they will buy the handbag, the shoes, or the dress, just not all at the same time.
New accessories and handbags will continue to sell, even if customers plan to wear them with last year’s little black dress.
Confirmation that digital supply chains are top of mind for apparel industry executives came last week with the latest plans from global sourcing specialist Li & Fung....
As a barometer of the issues top of mind for apparel sourcing executives, it is hard to beat the annual Prime Source Forum in Hong Kong. ...
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
- Rana Plaza four years on – Timeline of change
- Using worker surveys to drive supply chain change
- Trump and Brexit get a dose of pragmatism
- No US rush to Myanmar despite end to sanctions
- Where does VF supply chain sit in growth strategy?
- Amazon wins on-demand apparel manufacturing patent
- Driving ban intensifies Myanmar logistics hurdles
- Inditex, Adidas and Patagonia top ethical report
- Calls for supply chain transparency standard
- Trump bolsters "buy American" with executive order
- Global market review of denim and jeanswear – forecasts to 2022
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Myanmar - ISA Country Report
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Clothing Market in the Top 5 American Countries to 2021 - Market Size, Development, and Forecasts