Blog: Luxury versus landlords
Leonie Barrie | 27 January 2006
Landlords on a Manhattan street that’s a favourite destination for tourists looking for fake luxury goods this week agreed to ban the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton goods by their tenants. Eighteen buildings on the infamous New York ‘Canal Street Corridor’ are now covered by injunctions that include regular monitoring, clearly posted signs, and the eviction of tenants who possess fake Louis Vuitton products.
LVMH believes it is putting a stranglehold on the distribution of counterfeit goods – with the US move coming hot on the heels of its legal victory against the owner and operator of Beijing's ‘Silk Street’ shopping mall. But there’s also a danger that such crackdowns will push an already illegal trade even further underground, off the sidewalks and into stalls hidden in residential and office buildings. Yes this might be a strong reminder that the sale of counterfeits is a crime, but it also puts shoppers at risk.
Instead, what about following in the footsteps of the French and Italians, where it’s the consumers who can be fined for buying counterfeit goods? Visitors to Italy face fines of up to EUR10,000 if they’re caught buying counterfeit luxury goods. In August, a Philippine woman living in Florence was apparently fined EUR3,333 for buying fake sunglasses for EUR11, according to Help Consumatori, an Italian consumer information website. Custom officials in Rome are even planning to open a museum of copied goods to educate the public this month. The hope is that an educated customer base will also become a reluctant one if such fines are reinforced. And if the cost savings are over-ridden by high profile penalties, then demand for knock-off merchandise should start to dwindle.
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
Last week we marked the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States by taking a closer look at what's at stake for the textile and apparel trade – especially his promises t...
Continuing our look at what lies ahead for the apparel industry and its supply chain in 2017, the panel of industry experts consulted by just-style last week tackled likely shifts in the sourcing land...
- Hard hit Turkish industry is not knocked out
- "Power of the many" drives change at Otto Group
- China leads US apparel sources with falling prices
- Vietnam grows share of US apparel imports in 2016
- US apparel sector braces for potential cost hikes
- US Q4 in brief – Foot Locker, Nordstrom, Carter's
- Bangladesh crackdown has cost garment sector $100m
- Inditex and H&M boycott Dhaka Apparel Summit
- Macy's will "do the right thing", says Lundgren
- JC Penney to close 140 stores amid lower sales
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- Technical textile markets: product developments and innovations, December 2016
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022