Blog: Luxury versus landlords
Leonie Barrie | 27 January 2006
Landlords on a Manhattan street that’s a favourite destination for tourists looking for fake luxury goods this week agreed to ban the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton goods by their tenants. Eighteen buildings on the infamous New York ‘Canal Street Corridor’ are now covered by injunctions that include regular monitoring, clearly posted signs, and the eviction of tenants who possess fake Louis Vuitton products.
LVMH believes it is putting a stranglehold on the distribution of counterfeit goods – with the US move coming hot on the heels of its legal victory against the owner and operator of Beijing's ‘Silk Street’ shopping mall. But there’s also a danger that such crackdowns will push an already illegal trade even further underground, off the sidewalks and into stalls hidden in residential and office buildings. Yes this might be a strong reminder that the sale of counterfeits is a crime, but it also puts shoppers at risk.
Instead, what about following in the footsteps of the French and Italians, where it’s the consumers who can be fined for buying counterfeit goods? Visitors to Italy face fines of up to EUR10,000 if they’re caught buying counterfeit luxury goods. In August, a Philippine woman living in Florence was apparently fined EUR3,333 for buying fake sunglasses for EUR11, according to Help Consumatori, an Italian consumer information website. Custom officials in Rome are even planning to open a museum of copied goods to educate the public this month. The hope is that an educated customer base will also become a reluctant one if such fines are reinforced. And if the cost savings are over-ridden by high profile penalties, then demand for knock-off merchandise should start to dwindle.
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- EU eyes mandatory due diligence for apparel supply
- Digitalisation and data to disrupt supply chains
- Where next for Corporate Human Rights Benchmark?
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Li & Fung forms supply chain partnership with PVH
- US Q4 in brief – Finish Line, Oxford Industries
- Sears has "substantial doubt" of future
- Levi Strauss and ILO probe Cambodia factory death
- Adidas mulls roll-out of in-store customisation
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack