Blog: New survey challenges protectionist myth
Leonie Barrie | 17 April 2009
A raft of stimulus packages introduced to deal with the global economic crisis would seem to support mounting claims that protectionism has become rampant in the worldwide clothing and textile industry.
But not according to a new survey carried out by UK-based consultancy Clothesource, details of which are covered exclusively on just-style today (17 April).
Its Guide to Apparel Trade Rules studied rule and policy changes made since October 2008 by the 20 leading clothes importing countries and the 30 leading garment exporters.
And the results show that contrary to widespread belief, the world's leading textile and garment importers have abolished more barriers to trade in the past six months than ever before.
Only Turkey and India have put their energy into increasing import barriers, it says, whereas the US, the EU, Canada and Japan have actually made it easier for some importers to trade with them.
Even low-income garment-exporting countries like Mexico, Malaysia and Colombia have generally lowered barriers to trade.
And it seems the US Treasury department agrees. Earlier this week it refrained from accusing China of illegally manipulating its currency – much to the annoyance of textile trade groups who argue an artificially weak yuan disadvantages US manufacturers.
In its Semi-Annual Report to Congress on International Economic and Exchange Rate Policies, the Treasury said "China has taken steps to enhance exchange rate flexibility," although it conceded that the yuan is "undervalued."
An accusation would perhaps have led to more hassle than the US government needs right now. Not only the involvement of the International Monetary Fund but also intense negotiations with Beijing – at a time when the US would rather see China keep buying its debt.
Recent attempts by the governments of many garment-making countries to stimulate their economies have led to a new wave of protectionist sentiment. But the exact opposite is true for the clothing and ...
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Four steps to reduce product defects
- Geo-political uncertainty and how to survive it
- Adidas raises the bar for North America sales
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- H&M, VF Corp and Levi among most ethical companies
- US Q4 in brief – Destination XL Group, Caleres
- PVH Corp to acquire e-commerce retailer True&Co
- Target unveils "ambitious" store re-design plans
- Vietnam limits hazardous chemicals in apparel
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective