Blog: Number crunching China trade
Leonie Barrie | 10 October 2008
The decision by a US congressman to call on the government to start monitoring Chinese imports of textiles and clothing certainly makes for an eye-catching headline: indeed, it’s the top story on just-style today. But reading between the lines, is it really asking for anything more than is already happening?
House Ways and Means Committee chairman Charles B Rangel (D-NY) wants the US International Trade Commission (ITC) to collect data on the volume, value, unit value and import market share of the 34 customs categories of Chinese textile and apparel products currently under safeguard restrictions.
His request – backed by others in the textile community – is driven by concerns that there will be a dramatic increase in import levels and a drop in prices when existing safeguard quotas on some Chinese textile and apparel products expire on 31 December.
Chairman Rangel also wants the ITC to provide preliminary Customs data once every two weeks and final data once a month, post these reports on its website, and also provide historical data on the same articles going back to January 2003.
Oh, and he wants these reports “until such time that the Committee terminates or amends this request.”
Now I could be mistaken, but isn’t this information already available from the International Trade Administration’s Office of Textiles and Apparel?
Rengel is also at pains to point out that although the Committee oversees the administration of the antidumping and countervailing duty laws, and could initiate a safeguard investigation “as provided under China's Protocol of Accession to the WTO,” he simply wants the numbers.
He doesn’t want any analysis of the import data; he just wants to watch what’s happening.
“The Committee understands that these data already have been compiled,” the letter says. “The Committee simply seeks that the data be reported in the format requested.”
Perhaps the one thing he’s not asking for is the one thing US protectionists want: action against China.
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- Digitalisation and data to disrupt supply chains
- EU eyes mandatory due diligence for apparel supply
- Where next for Corporate Human Rights Benchmark?
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Li & Fung forms supply chain partnership with PVH
- US Q4 in brief – Finish Line, Oxford Industries
- Sears has "substantial doubt" of future
- Levi Strauss and ILO probe Cambodia factory death
- Adidas mulls roll-out of in-store customisation
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack