Blog: President Obama's textile stance?
Leonie Barrie | 22 January 2009
Since his inauguration on Tuesday, President Obama has shown that he’s keen to get stuck in to the hundreds of urgent items on his agenda. But textiles certainly isn’t one of them.
As Mike Flanagan pointed out in his analysis of the new Administration’s priorities, trade doesn’t seem to be getting a look in right now – let alone the likelihood of a protectionist stance against foreign clothing suppliers like China. Which of course is good news for US importers and retailers placing orders in China who need as much predictability as possible when it comes to their sourcing decisions.
Of course there’s no certainty that imposing restrictions on imports won’t happen eventually, but in the short term at least there seems to be a consensus of opinion that the economy will be the centre of attention.
Speaking to a number of apparel industry executives in the course of putting together a management briefing on industry issues to watch in 2009, the view seems to be that the new government is going to work on the broader economic issues affecting the US first.
Julie Hughes, senior vice president of USA-ITA (the US Association of Importers of Textiles and Apparel) says: “The conventional wisdom in the US right now is that the Obama Administration will not take any action for special textile protection for at least their first six months in office.”
Kevin Burke, president of The American Apparel & Footwear Association (AAFA) believes that when the Obama Administration begins to focus on trade, “it will likely focus first on enforcement of current trade agreements before looking at creating new trade agreements.”
Hughes also notes that “while there is certainly the potential for the textile industry – or for specific companies – to file trade cases to begin anti-dumping or countervailing duty or China product-specific investigations, those close to the textile industry suggest that the high legal fees remain a deterrent to the filing of cases.”
And Mike Flanagan adds that the threat of protectionism “is nothing like the big deal many people make it out to be.”
Relations with China matter more to the US trade policymakers than their domestic textile lobbies, he believes, noting: “There are just about as many votes wanting more sales of Boeings or Airbuses to China as there are wanting textile jobs to be protected in the Carolinas.”
Some of just-style’s more eagle-eyed readers might have noticed a small change to the menu bar on the homepage: the addition of the word re:source. Yes it might be a small change – but it marks the co...
Over the past week just-style has continued to try to unravel the potential ramifications of Donald Trump’s election as the next president of the United States....
One event dominated the international airwaves last week, and on just-style too we took a closer look at the surprise election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States....
As the Brexit roller-coaster continues to twist and turn, and the US presidential election campaign nears its unpredictable and possibly protectionist end, there's no doubt these events – and the perc...
- Steps to piloting living wage in garment factories
- How to ensure sustainability is more than a slogan
- Trump blows the case for Brexit out of the water
- US apparel retailers' November 2016 sales roundup
- Duty-free trade key to build Africa supply chains
- US Q3 in brief – Destination Maternity, Cherokee
- Esquel efficiency drive continues to boost brands
- Taiwan textile maker investing in first US plant
- Outdoor apparel sector set for double-digit growth
- Myanmar garment industry "lacking labour rights"