Blog: Primark reacts to TV onslaught
Joe Ayling | 16 June 2008
Bargain fashion firm Primark has been forced onto the ethical offensive in reaction to recent UK television documentaries about cheap labour.
The retailer's ethics came to a head today when it ended business with three Indian suppliers following a company investigation arising from BBC findings.
Primark's investigation found that the factories had sub-contracted embroidery and sequin work on a small number of designs to unapproved sub-contractors, which involved home working and instances of child labour.
According to the BBC, it was the broadcaster's Panorama programme that alerted Primark to the problems - having carried out a six-month investigation.
However, fashion has been the focus of a number of other TV programmes in recent months as questions continue to be asked about the ethics of producing cheap clothes.
The well-publicised BBC series Blood, Sweat and T-Shirts showed six young fashion addicts experiencing life as factory workers in India, and is due to be followed up by a Channel 4 documentary called "The Devil Wears Primark".
The Channel 4 documentary was due to start earlier this month, and advertised to viewers before later being pulled from the running order.
Primark seems to have taken the brunt of such sourcing debates, perhaps due to its low prices and high exposure (it became the UK's second largest clothing retailer last year), although the likes of Topshop and H&M hardly came off unscathed either.
What stood out to just-style in today's news though was a significant attempt by Primark to clear things up, and defend the way it does business, in particular the following comments: "Primark’s prices are low because we don’t overcharge our customers.
"Most of our clothes are bought from the same factories as other fashion retailers and people producing them are paid exactly the same whatever the label and whatever the price in the shop.
"We are able to offer good value and good quality because of low mark-ups and big volumes. We use simple designs, our overhead costs are extremely low and we don’t run expensive advertising campaigns."
In short, the company is looking to extinguish any misconceptions that the devil would choose Primark over any other fast fashion retailer just because it is cheap.
By Joe Ayling, news editor
In the wake of recent allegations about sourcing practices at three fashion retailers, Jozef De Coster looks at a pan-European organisation – the Business Social Compliance Initiative – which believes...
Continuing our look at what lies ahead for the apparel industry and its supply chain in 2017, the panel of industry experts consulted by just-style last week tackled likely shifts in the sourcing land...
This week our focus turns to first thoughts from a panel of industry experts consulted by just-style on the challenges and opportunities likely to face the apparel supply chain in 2017, with prospects...
Welcome back after the holiday break, and from the team here at just-style I’d like to wish all our readers a happy and prosperous New Year....
- Apparel factory auditing is in the firing line
- How US border adjustment tax could affect apparel
- Trump and the apparel industry – Infographic
- "Buy American, Hire American" to guide Trump trade
- Ten retail trends to watch for in 2017
- Trump signs order to withdraw from TPP
- UK clothing factory workers paid half minimum wage
- Brands need to tackle Turkey factory refugee abuse
- Patagonia launching circular economy platform
- Auditing "in need of reinvention" says new project
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Global apparel markets: product developments and innovations, October 2016
- Anti-odour clothing: fresh fashion for an active lifestyle
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022