Blog: Primark reacts to TV onslaught
Joe Ayling | 16 June 2008
Bargain fashion firm Primark has been forced onto the ethical offensive in reaction to recent UK television documentaries about cheap labour.
The retailer's ethics came to a head today when it ended business with three Indian suppliers following a company investigation arising from BBC findings.
Primark's investigation found that the factories had sub-contracted embroidery and sequin work on a small number of designs to unapproved sub-contractors, which involved home working and instances of child labour.
According to the BBC, it was the broadcaster's Panorama programme that alerted Primark to the problems - having carried out a six-month investigation.
However, fashion has been the focus of a number of other TV programmes in recent months as questions continue to be asked about the ethics of producing cheap clothes.
The well-publicised BBC series Blood, Sweat and T-Shirts showed six young fashion addicts experiencing life as factory workers in India, and is due to be followed up by a Channel 4 documentary called "The Devil Wears Primark".
The Channel 4 documentary was due to start earlier this month, and advertised to viewers before later being pulled from the running order.
Primark seems to have taken the brunt of such sourcing debates, perhaps due to its low prices and high exposure (it became the UK's second largest clothing retailer last year), although the likes of Topshop and H&M hardly came off unscathed either.
What stood out to just-style in today's news though was a significant attempt by Primark to clear things up, and defend the way it does business, in particular the following comments: "Primark’s prices are low because we don’t overcharge our customers.
"Most of our clothes are bought from the same factories as other fashion retailers and people producing them are paid exactly the same whatever the label and whatever the price in the shop.
"We are able to offer good value and good quality because of low mark-ups and big volumes. We use simple designs, our overhead costs are extremely low and we don’t run expensive advertising campaigns."
In short, the company is looking to extinguish any misconceptions that the devil would choose Primark over any other fast fashion retailer just because it is cheap.
By Joe Ayling, news editor
In the wake of recent allegations about sourcing practices at three fashion retailers, Jozef De Coster looks at a pan-European organisation – the Business Social Compliance Initiative – which believes...
Fashion retailer H&M and UK based glove and leather manufacturer Pittards both say they are monitoring the situation in Ethiopia closely after the country's government declared a state of emergency af...
Increasing competition for garment sourcing contracts is seeing China not only being challenged by other countries in Asia, but by sub-Saharan African and even Russian suppliers too. And it is pushing...
The monthly minimum wage for workers in Cambodia's textile, garment and footwear sector is set to rise to $153 from January next year, following a vote on the issue last week. The increase marks a ris...
- Fashion fit for the future – strategies for speed
- Digitisation to drive new apparel-making models
- Will new Vietnam wage hinder competitiveness?
- Under Armour Lighthouse will disrupt production
- How TAL Apparel is staying ahead of the game
- Child refugees found in Turkey apparel factories
- Chinese manufacturer invests $20m in US facility
- Reebok Liquid Factory reinvents shoe production
- Gap to shutter all UK Banana Republic stores
- US Q3 in brief - Under Armour, VF Corp, Skechers
- Africa-Med strategic sourcing review – comparing East Africa, North Africa and Turkey
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Apparel (GLOBAL) - Industry Report
- Global Sports and Fitness Wear Market 2016-2020