Blog: Scaremongering on safeguards
Leonie Barrie | 16 September 2009
There’s a lot of scaremongering going on just now, with media reports and trade groups hinting that President Obama’s decision to impose tariffs on imported tyres from China will lead to a flood of new petitions – especially from the textile and apparel industry.
I spent most of yesterday talking to industry experts about the situation, and they’re agreed that while there’s a slim chance some petitions will be filed against apparel made in China, the likelihood is largely being exaggerated.
The big difference between tyres and textiles, it seems, hinges not on US law but on the accession agreement signed when China joined the WTO in late 2001.
This says an industry may petition for duties against Chinese companies if it is unfairly damaged by a surge in imports – but unlike soaring tyre imports, most US shipments of Chinese-made textiles and apparel are falling as a result of the global and US economic downturn.
Trade expert Brenda Jacobs, an attorney at Sidley Austin LLP also points out that it’s hard to imagine any relief against Chinese imports would be useful because there are literally dozens of other foreign (mostly Asian) suppliers available to fill any void.
Which also means a reprisal of the safeguards wouldn’t save any US apparel jobs.
And with a track record that already includes a special three year textile safeguard and, before that, the 40-plus year quota program, new tariffs on apparel would be likely to harm larger US national economic interests.
USA-ITA executive director Laura Jones adds that the whole point of the China safeguard is to give industry time to adjust to a surge in imports.
“After five decades, if there are any US fabric or apparel makers who haven’t adjusted by now, yet another bite at the protectionist apple isn’t going to give them new life,” she notes.
A special seminar being held on Friday 18 September at the USA-ITA offices in Washington DC to discuss 'What's Next for China Safeguard Measures?' Brenda Jacobs of Sidley Austin LLP will be guest speaker. Click here for more details.
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
Last week we marked the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States by taking a closer look at what's at stake for the textile and apparel trade – especially his promises t...
Continuing our look at what lies ahead for the apparel industry and its supply chain in 2017, the panel of industry experts consulted by just-style last week tackled likely shifts in the sourcing land...
- "Power of the many" drives change at Otto Group
- Hard hit Turkish industry is not knocked out
- China leads US apparel sources with falling prices
- US apparel sector braces for potential cost hikes
- Vietnam grows share of US apparel imports in 2016
- US Q4 in brief – Foot Locker, Nordstrom, Carter's
- JC Penney to close 140 stores amid lower sales
- Inditex and H&M boycott Dhaka Apparel Summit
- Bangladesh government steps in on labour crackdown
- Bangladesh calls for duty-free access to US
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- Technical textile markets: product developments and innovations, December 2016
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022