Blog: Sweat-free or spin?
Leonie Barrie | 12 October 2005
Jeans giant Levi Strauss has become the latest clothing brand to wear its sourcing credentials on its sleeve – following in the footsteps of Nike which in April this year published a list of the names and locations of its 715 suppliers. Partly in response to demands from consumers who want to know where and under what conditions their clothes are made, Levi’s list details more than 750 active owned-and-operated and contract factories producing Levi’s, Dockers and Levi Strauss Signature branded products.
However, the move is not only designed to make the company more transparent for ethical reasons; Levi Strauss sees corporate responsibility as a way of improving its performance rather than just protecting its reputation. For instance, it says it hopes similar levels of transparency will become the norm across the apparel sector, making it easier to devise common standards among brands using the same contract manufacturers.
And surely, when brands are working together on compliance issues the whole problem of factory monitoring becomes more effective and less burdensome, allowing suppliers to focus time and resources on making improvements that benefit workers – and making clothes of course. Attention to one aspect of staff management often leads to improvement in others. Which can’t be a bad thing. I’m sure we’ve all visited factories where a constant stream of inspections from each and every one of their customers or their nominated CSR agents, often several times a year, not only disrupts production but is a costly exercise for everyone concerned.
But if it’s really such a positive push, why hasn’t it been more widespread until now? Maybe criticism from human rights groups has had something to do with it in the past. Or fear of giving away too much information to competitors. It’s all too easy to be sceptical when companies boast how socially responsible they are – but is there really anything wrong with retailers and manufacturers adopting ethical sourcing as their new sales pitch?
As long as everyone benefits there will be more than enough of an incentive to continue.
Confirmation that digital supply chains are top of mind for apparel industry executives came last week with the latest plans from global sourcing specialist Li & Fung....
As a barometer of the issues top of mind for apparel sourcing executives, it is hard to beat the annual Prime Source Forum in Hong Kong. ...
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
- Rana Plaza four years on – Timeline of change
- Why collaboration is key to fashion supply chains
- Industry groups reaffirm commitment to Bangladesh
- Trump and Brexit get a dose of pragmatism
- Using worker surveys to drive supply chain change
- Adidas to digitalise Speedfactory concept
- Nike filed patent for "reinforced denim"
- M&S extends sourcing deal with Lindsey brothers
- Gap unveils five-year sustainable fibres pledge
- US Q1 in brief – Columbia Sportswear, Amazon
- Global market review of denim and jeanswear – forecasts to 2022
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Clothing Market in the Top 5 American Countries to 2021 - Market Size, Development, and Forecasts
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective