Blog: Sweatshop in Queens
Leonie Barrie | 24 July 2008
All too often we hear about worker exploitation in overseas apparel factories, which perhaps gives us the glow of satisfaction that all’s well in those facilities that manage to cling on in the face of adversity in supposedly developed countries.
And the impression that poor working conditions just couldn’t happen on our own doorsteps is reinforced time and time again as retailers, brands, and importers chase lower and lower costs abroad, usually at the expense of producers closer to home where higher wage costs and a network of legislation exists to protect employees.
But it’s clearly not the case, as a sensational expose by the New York Department of Labor found yesterday.
It has tagged more than 10,000 garments produced by Jin Shun Incorporated, a factory on the outskirts of Manhattan, as ‘Unlawfully Manufactured.’
It wants to draw attention to the fact that not only did the manufacturer swindle workers out of more than $5m in unpaid wages, but took extraordinary steps to conceal the violations - including coaching employees to lie to investigators’ questions.
The tags are a neat way of drawing attention to the problem. Under the “hot goods law,” it is a misdemeanor for anyone other than the Department or the consumer to remove these labels.
And it achieved an almost immediate result, since within hours of the tagging the manufacturer, Urban Apparel, paid $60,000 in underpayments to have the labels removed.
The Department of Labor also had harsh words to say to retailers and manufacturers: “Cursory inspection in monitoring factories is not enough. We in government are getting more aggressive in ensuring that suppliers abide by the law.
“While you may require your suppliers to abide by strict codes of conduct, these codes do workers no good if they are not aggressively enforced.”
Perhaps labour enforcers in other countries should take note too.
Confirmation that digital supply chains are top of mind for apparel industry executives came last week with the latest plans from global sourcing specialist Li & Fung....
As a barometer of the issues top of mind for apparel sourcing executives, it is hard to beat the annual Prime Source Forum in Hong Kong. ...
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
- Using worker surveys to drive supply chain change
- Rana Plaza four years on – Timeline of change
- Trump and Brexit get a dose of pragmatism
- No US rush to Myanmar despite end to sanctions
- Where does VF supply chain sit in growth strategy?
- Amazon wins on-demand apparel manufacturing patent
- Driving ban intensifies Myanmar logistics hurdles
- Trump bolsters "buy American" with executive order
- Inditex, Adidas and Patagonia top ethical report
- Calls for supply chain transparency standard
- Global market review of denim and jeanswear – forecasts to 2022
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Myanmar - ISA Country Report
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Clothing Market in the Top 5 American Countries to 2021 - Market Size, Development, and Forecasts