Blog: Sweatshop in Queens
Leonie Barrie | 24 July 2008
All too often we hear about worker exploitation in overseas apparel factories, which perhaps gives us the glow of satisfaction that all’s well in those facilities that manage to cling on in the face of adversity in supposedly developed countries.
And the impression that poor working conditions just couldn’t happen on our own doorsteps is reinforced time and time again as retailers, brands, and importers chase lower and lower costs abroad, usually at the expense of producers closer to home where higher wage costs and a network of legislation exists to protect employees.
But it’s clearly not the case, as a sensational expose by the New York Department of Labor found yesterday.
It has tagged more than 10,000 garments produced by Jin Shun Incorporated, a factory on the outskirts of Manhattan, as ‘Unlawfully Manufactured.’
It wants to draw attention to the fact that not only did the manufacturer swindle workers out of more than $5m in unpaid wages, but took extraordinary steps to conceal the violations - including coaching employees to lie to investigators’ questions.
The tags are a neat way of drawing attention to the problem. Under the “hot goods law,” it is a misdemeanor for anyone other than the Department or the consumer to remove these labels.
And it achieved an almost immediate result, since within hours of the tagging the manufacturer, Urban Apparel, paid $60,000 in underpayments to have the labels removed.
The Department of Labor also had harsh words to say to retailers and manufacturers: “Cursory inspection in monitoring factories is not enough. We in government are getting more aggressive in ensuring that suppliers abide by the law.
“While you may require your suppliers to abide by strict codes of conduct, these codes do workers no good if they are not aggressively enforced.”
Perhaps labour enforcers in other countries should take note too.
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
Last week we marked the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States by taking a closer look at what's at stake for the textile and apparel trade – especially his promises t...
Continuing our look at what lies ahead for the apparel industry and its supply chain in 2017, the panel of industry experts consulted by just-style last week tackled likely shifts in the sourcing land...
- China leads US apparel sources with falling prices
- Vietnam grows share of US apparel imports in 2016
- Hard hit Turkish industry is not knocked out
- US apparel sector braces for potential cost hikes
- Trade Tracker – Trump's first weeks, Brexit agenda
- VF Corp sees Q4 and FY earnings tumble
- US Q4 in brief – Dillard's, Macy's, Walmart
- Adidas and Burberry recognised for sustainability
- Bangladesh crackdown has cost garment sector $100m
- Bangladesh "high threat" for terrorist activity
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- Technical textile markets: product developments and innovations, December 2016
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar