Blog: The weight debate
Leonie Barrie | 26 January 2007
Just compare and contrast the two different stances taken by the fashion industries in the UK and Spain this week. Yesterday the British Fashion Council refused to ban ultra-thin models from catwalk shows, urging the industry to instead use “healthy models for its collections”; while on Wednesday some of Spain’s top retailers pledged to re-size their clothes to reflect “real women.” In fact, fashion show organisers in Madrid were the first to spark the debate over the link between ultra-thin catwalk models and eating disorders in young girls – and enforced the ban so strictly that around one-third of models were turned away from its catwalks in September. And last month fashion houses in Milan also lent their support by introducing a voluntary ban on super-skinny models.
So why does London seem to be dragging its heels? The links between ultra-thin models and rising levels of eating disorders in impressionable consumers seems to be proven. As does the fact that it’s not healthy for anyone – models included – to be a US size zero (UK size 4) as several recent deaths show. So suggesting that designers and model agencies use “healthy” models, without stipulating what this is, is pretty much giving the industry a free reign to set its own guidelines. This is exactly what it’s been doing for years.
Of course an outright ban on skinny models would be difficult to enforce. Would it mean having weighing scales and doctors behind the scenes at every fashion show? Or maybe it’s because the sponsors of London Fashion Week, including Topshop, Tissot, Superdrug and Renault, can’t reach an agreement. Or perhaps there needs to be a more widespread consensus between not only the designers, but also retailers and the media to lead a change of opinion and, more importantly, attitude. But if they can make these changes work in Spain, then why can’t we in London?
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
- Digitalisation and data to disrupt supply chains
- 3D CAD comes of age
- EU eyes mandatory due diligence for apparel supply
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Li & Fung forms supply chain partnership with PVH
- Big data to help US firms improve clothing fit
- Levi Strauss and ILO probe Cambodia factory death
- US Q4 in brief – G-III Apparel, Finish Line
- Labour rights risk Bangladesh EU trade benefits?
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack