Blog: The weight debate
Leonie Barrie | 26 January 2007
Just compare and contrast the two different stances taken by the fashion industries in the UK and Spain this week. Yesterday the British Fashion Council refused to ban ultra-thin models from catwalk shows, urging the industry to instead use “healthy models for its collections”; while on Wednesday some of Spain’s top retailers pledged to re-size their clothes to reflect “real women.” In fact, fashion show organisers in Madrid were the first to spark the debate over the link between ultra-thin catwalk models and eating disorders in young girls – and enforced the ban so strictly that around one-third of models were turned away from its catwalks in September. And last month fashion houses in Milan also lent their support by introducing a voluntary ban on super-skinny models.
So why does London seem to be dragging its heels? The links between ultra-thin models and rising levels of eating disorders in impressionable consumers seems to be proven. As does the fact that it’s not healthy for anyone – models included – to be a US size zero (UK size 4) as several recent deaths show. So suggesting that designers and model agencies use “healthy” models, without stipulating what this is, is pretty much giving the industry a free reign to set its own guidelines. This is exactly what it’s been doing for years.
Of course an outright ban on skinny models would be difficult to enforce. Would it mean having weighing scales and doctors behind the scenes at every fashion show? Or maybe it’s because the sponsors of London Fashion Week, including Topshop, Tissot, Superdrug and Renault, can’t reach an agreement. Or perhaps there needs to be a more widespread consensus between not only the designers, but also retailers and the media to lead a change of opinion and, more importantly, attitude. But if they can make these changes work in Spain, then why can’t we in London?
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
Last week we marked the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States by taking a closer look at what's at stake for the textile and apparel trade – especially his promises t...
Continuing our look at what lies ahead for the apparel industry and its supply chain in 2017, the panel of industry experts consulted by just-style last week tackled likely shifts in the sourcing land...
- China leads US apparel sources with falling prices
- Vietnam grows share of US apparel imports in 2016
- US apparel sector braces for potential cost hikes
- Trade Tracker – Trump's first weeks, Brexit agenda
- Key trade issues facing US textiles and apparel
- Bangladesh "high threat" for terrorist activity
- VF Corp sees Q4 and FY earnings tumble
- Adidas and Burberry recognised for sustainability
- Sales at US clothing retailers jumped in January
- Ralph Lauren new execs to support Way Forward Plan
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- Technical textile markets: product developments and innovations, December 2016
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022