Blog: Under the wire?
Leonie Barrie | 15 August 2005
Are European retailers and importers really to blame for the fiasco – for that’s what it’s turning into – over the new Chinese clothing quotas? The new import restrictions were negotiated in June on ten categories of Chinese textile and clothing products. Less than two months later, and pullovers and trousers have already reached their quantitative limits for the whole of 2005.
Shipments up to July 11, when the EU-China agreement came into force, have been allowed into Europe – but EU trade chief Peter Mandelson has accused Chinese and EU traders of trying to get their pullovers and trousers into Europe “under the wire.” “The sheer scale of their attempt to beat the restrictions has presented [the Commission] with immense difficulties,” he said.
But EU officials knew Chinese imports were soaring; after all it was this that prompted them to reimpose quotas in the first place. So did they really expect the flood to slow to a trickle in a matter of weeks? And it’s not about last-minute orders either, as Mandelson has implied. Despite industry talk about shorter lead times and fast fashion, importers will have placed their bulk orders many months before the deal. And it is these garments – in most cases making up the new autumn/winter ranges – that are now sitting in containers, stranded in transit.
With no clear provisions about how to deal with orders that were already en route to Europe, the EC says that final decisions, including some flexibility on the future management of the quotas will not be taken until early September and “will be resolved in agreement with the Chinese authorities.” In the meantime, it hopes to be able to offer some flexibility for pullovers. Retailers, too, are pinning their fortunes on a solution – and one that doesn’t mean additional exports will be stopped from entering the market. At such short notice it will prove nearly impossible to source autumn collections elsewhere, and shoppers may be charged higher prices for those clothes that make it into the stores.
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
Fresh from their disappointment at seeing the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade deal abandoned last month with an executive order by President Donald Trump, the US apparel and footwear sector...
With the ultimate aim of ensuring all the cotton in its products is sourced sustainably, value clothing retailer Primark is adamant that having a business model focused on offering the lowest prices o...
- What TTIP might mean for US, EU textiles & apparel
- Unlocks for the future fashion sourcing landscape
- EU eyes mandatory due diligence for apparel supply
- Geo-political uncertainty and how to survive it
- Four steps to reduce product defects
- US Q4 in brief – Finish Line, Oxford Industries
- Li & Fung forms supply chain partnership with PVH
- Sears has "substantial doubt" of future
- Vietnam limits hazardous chemicals in apparel
- H&M, VF Corp and Levi among most ethical companies
- Central and East Europe Report Package
- Central America strategic sourcing review - a focus on Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective