Blog: VF plans leave little room for error
Leonie Barrie | 21 March 2011
US apparel giant VF Corporation last week unveiled aggressive five-year expansion plans, targeting revenue growth of US$5bn by 2015 and a $5 hike in earnings per share.
Central to the company's projections is its portfolio of outdoor and action sports brands, most notably The North Face and Vans, which are tasked with generating $3bn of that $5bn revenue growth. Other segments will have to pull their weight too: a combination of sportswear, imagewear and contemporary brands are scheduled to add an extra $1bn. And jeanswear, led by the Wrangler and Lee brands, is set to contribute a similar figure, helped by international sales in Asia, Europe and Latin America.
The strategy seems to cover all the bases. But it will also take an almost 100% hit rate to meet its goals.
Meanwhile sportswear leader Nike is fretting about the cost of doing business, after its third quarter earnings missed expectations and it warned that rising oil, cotton and transport costs are set to continue to affect its near-term profitability. The company is also vowing to hike its prices this year in a bid to offset input pressures.
Oregon-based Nike saw quarterly profit rise 5% to $523m on the back of a 7% increase in sales. And futures orders, an important measure of upcoming demand, are up 9%. But gross margins fell 110 basis points to 45.8%.
Meanwhile, German sporting goods firm Puma has promoted head of strategy, Franz Koch, as its new CEO, replacing Jochen Zeitz who has been in charge for the past 18 years. Zeitz is to head the sports lifestyle division of Puma's owner, French retail group PPR.
And over in India, garment manufacturers have staged a two-day strike to protest against a proposed 10% excise duty on branded India-made ready-to-wear garments. Firms fear the new tax will make this highly labour intensive industry uncompetitive against imports, and hope to prevent the plans, which were outlined in last month's budget, from being passed by the Indian parliament.
Though exporters are exempt, they too are anxious and claim the close links between domestic sales and export garment production would increase administrative costs and bureaucracy for exporters.
Some of just-style’s more eagle-eyed readers might have noticed a small change to the menu bar on the homepage: the addition of the word re:source. Yes it might be a small change – but it marks the co...
Over the past week just-style has continued to try to unravel the potential ramifications of Donald Trump’s election as the next president of the United States....
One event dominated the international airwaves last week, and on just-style too we took a closer look at the surprise election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States....
As the Brexit roller-coaster continues to twist and turn, and the US presidential election campaign nears its unpredictable and possibly protectionist end, there's no doubt these events – and the perc...
- Why do modern robotics elude sportswear makers?
- Traditional financing is a misfit for fast fashion
- Trump trade policy – Who knows what he'll do?
- Planning is key to an effective inventory strategy
- How would end of NAFTA affect US apparel industry?
- US Q3 in brief - G-III Apparel, Express
- Bagir exports first trousers for H&M from Ethiopia
- Film documents Cambodia garment workers' stories
- Esquel efficiency drive continues to boost brands
- Pakistan suspends India cotton imports
- Outdoor performance apparel 2016: A broader perspective
- Global market review of lingerie – forecasts to 2022
- Global apparel markets: product developments and innovations, October 2016
- Footwear Top 5 Emerging Markets Industry Guide_2016
- REPORT BUNDLE: Africa-Med, Southeast Asia and Central America strategic sourcing pack