Blog: Vietnam review skewed?
Leonie Barrie | 29 October 2007
Critics of the US monitoring programme on apparel imports from Vietnam argue that it’s unjustified, and having seen some of the numbers quoted by the Department of Commerce I must agree they don’t seem to stack up.
Of the 486 tariff lines covered by the monitoring programme, there was no trade at all from Vietnam in 317 of them. Significantly, of the remaining tariff lines, many had rising unit values, indicating that prices from Vietnam have increased since it joined the World Trade Organization in January - the complete antithesis of the dumping argument.
Trends in unit values and import levels were then compared with other suppliers of these products to the US, including India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, Indonesia, DR-CAFTA (Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua), the Philippines, Malaysia, Macau and Cambodia.
And after all this, it was concluded that there was insufficient evidence of dumping to self-initiate an investigation.
The process will take place twice more over the next year. But the question many US importers and retailers want answered is why this wasn’t an opportunity for the Commerce Department to cancel the apparel monitoring programme altogether, or at the very least remove many of these products from the programme?
For anyone interested in the investigation, The Commerce Department posts import data on the Vietnam Textile and Apparel Import Monitoring Program website.
Confirmation that digital supply chains are top of mind for apparel industry executives came last week with the latest plans from global sourcing specialist Li & Fung....
As a barometer of the issues top of mind for apparel sourcing executives, it is hard to beat the annual Prime Source Forum in Hong Kong. ...
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
- Rana Plaza four years on – Timeline of change
- Trump and Brexit get a dose of pragmatism
- Using worker surveys to drive supply chain change
- Industry groups reaffirm commitment to Bangladesh
- Where does VF supply chain sit in growth strategy?
- Nike filed patent for "reinforced denim"
- US textile industry applauds Trump executive order
- Gap unveils five-year sustainable fibres pledge
- Pentland Brands reveals Berghaus factory list
- Adidas and Reebok top transparency index
- Global market review of denim and jeanswear – forecasts to 2022
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Clothing Market in the Top 5 American Countries to 2021 - Market Size, Development, and Forecasts
- Myanmar - ISA Country Report