Blog: Worker rights
Leonie Barrie | 14 September 2005
Retailers around the world will be keenly following the progress of a lawsuit that effectively makes Wal-Mart legally viable for the welfare of workers at its suppliers’ factories. The lawsuit, which has been filed by the International Labor Rights Fund on behalf of apparel workers in Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Nicaragua and Swaziland, says Wal-Mart violated its contractual obligations by failing to enforce the codes of conduct set up to protect its overseas workers.
It sets a number of precedents likely to cause concern to US companies. For instance, it argues that the code of conduct signed with suppliers created contractual obligations between Wal-Mart and the workers, even though they were not directly employed by the retailer. And it says Wal-Mart made false and misleading statements to the American public about its labour and human rights practices.
The workers – who say they were paid less than the minimum wage, were not allowed holidays, were forced to work overtime, were beaten by managers and were locked in their factories – have few enforceable mechanisms in their home countries to address these violations.
The track record of their legal team makes the success of this case a very real certainty too. It recently sued Los Angeles-based Unocal corporation on behalf of Burmese plaintiffs used as forced labour during the construction of a natural gas pipeline. The suit was settled earlier this year in the plaintiffs' favour for an estimated $30 million in cash.
Confirmation that digital supply chains are top of mind for apparel industry executives came last week with the latest plans from global sourcing specialist Li & Fung....
As a barometer of the issues top of mind for apparel sourcing executives, it is hard to beat the annual Prime Source Forum in Hong Kong. ...
Over the past month, Donald Trump and his team failed to offer any clear plan to ensure Americans would "Buy American, Hire American" - while the British government's attempts to clarify the specifics...
The Bangladesh government was forced to respond late last week to pressure over its crackdown on labour activists after a number of global brands and retailers, including H&M and Inditex announced pla...
- No US rush to Myanmar despite end to sanctions
- Using worker surveys to drive supply chain change
- Where does VF supply chain sit in growth strategy?
- Investment continues in Ethiopia clothing sector
- Rana Plaza four years on – Timeline of change
- Driving ban intensifies Myanmar logistics hurdles
- Amazon wins on-demand apparel manufacturing patent
- Trump bolsters "buy American" with executive order
- Inditex, Adidas and Patagonia top ethical report
- Start-ups chosen to re-think fashion industry
- Global market review of denim and jeanswear – forecasts to 2022
- When Things Go Wrong - A Practical Guide to Managing Common Problems in Apparel Sourcing
- Myanmar - ISA Country Report
- Southeast Asia strategic sourcing review – a focus on Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar
- Clothing Market in the Top 5 American Countries to 2021 - Market Size, Development, and Forecasts