Blog: Leonie BarrieFootwear fury

Leonie Barrie | 9 October 2006

In European Union circles, apathy seems to count for more than action. Take last week’s voting on the introduction of anti-dumping duties on footwear imports from China and Vietnam. Even though a majority of 12 EU member states voted against the Commission’s proposals – and just nine voted in favour of them – it was still passed.

Why? Because four other member states abstained from the voting, and under EU rules, an abstention is considered a vote in favour of the Commission’s proposal. Therefore, the Commissions recommendations were carried on a 13 (9 Yes + 4 Abstentions) to 12 vote. So the footwear industry will now be hounded for the next two years by a ruling that no-one really wanted in the first place. The same thing happened when voting took place to introduce preliminary anti-dumping duties earlier this year. Surely it’s a case of bureaucracy gone barmy?

EU: China, Vietnam, trade groups slam shoe tariffs


BLOG

Trump trade probe could have costs for cotton

An International Trade Commission hearing got underway last week as part of the Trump administration's probe into China's intellectual property practices under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act. The a...

BLOG

Stop negotiating and bring in the engineers

Surviving in a declining market is the biggest challenge for discount/mass-market retailers and suppliers of commodity products such as basic T-shirts, hoodies or cotton men's shirts – which is why it...

BLOG

The implications of buyer purchasing practices

New research has delved into one relatively underexplored aspect of global supply chains: how buyer purchasing practices impact wages and working conditions....

BLOG

just-style readership survey 2017 – Final reminder

We’re currently carrying out a survey to get a better understanding of the issues that matter the most to our readers, and how we can better serve you in the future. ...

just-style homepage



Forgot your password?