Skip to site menu Skip to page content

Daily Newsletter

28 January 2026

Daily Newsletter

28 January 2026

Industry coalition raises alarm over state-run PROs in EU EPR schemes

A coalition of industry organisations has voiced significant concerns regarding the emerging trend of state-run Producer Responsibility Organisations (PROs) within the European Union's (EU) Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes.

Jangoulun Singsit January 28 2026

This development, observed in several EU Member States, threatens to undermine the foundational principles of EPR systems, which are crucial for the region’s circular economy framework, said the coalition.

The industry groups, including E-commerce Europe, EURATEX, and the Global Fashion Agenda, among others, emphasise that EPR systems should remain producer-driven, transparent, and accountable, as mandated by Article 8a of the Waste Framework Directive.

They argue that harmonisation across the EU is vital to maintain a functional Single Market and to minimise administrative burdens.

Furthermore, a clear delineation of roles between regulators, supervisors, and operators is essential to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure good governance.

Recent shifts towards assigning PRO functions to state-owned or controlled bodies have raised alarms. Such models, already seen in waste streams like packaging and batteries, risk diluting the core governance principles of EPR if roles are not distinctly separated.

The industry warns that when the state assumes multiple roles as regulator, supervisor, and operator, it can lead to reduced transparency, limited accountability, and the potential misuse of EPR fees as public revenue rather than targeted funding.

The design of PRO models has significant implications for investment and financing. Predictable governance structures and transparent fee-setting mechanisms are crucial for attracting private capital necessary for waste management infrastructure.

Conversely, state-run models may deter investment due to perceived fiscal risks and unclear reinvestment strategies.

The industry coalition calls for a coherent, predictable, and harmonised approach to EPR across the EU.

It urges policymakers to ensure that EPR systems remain producer-driven, a one-stop shop for registration and reporting and avoid state-run models that could fragment the Single Market and weaken governance.

Maintaining a clear financial separation between EPR fees and public budgets is essential to uphold transparency and trust, the coalition suggested.

The undersigned organisations stand ready to collaborate with European institutions and Member States to safeguard effective, harmonised, and producer-driven EPR systems that support circularity and environmental integrity.

In late 2025, six fashion, textile, footwear and retail associations in Germany collaborated on a EPR system, specifically for the country's textile industry.

Last June, the Federation of the European Sporting Goods Industry (FESI) voiced support for the new Single Market Strategy released by the European Commission (EC) and calls for streamlined labelling and EPR schemes.

Uncover your next opportunity with expert reports

Steer your business strategy with key data and insights from our latest market research reports and company profiles. Not ready to buy? Start small by downloading a sample report first.

Newsletters by sectors

close

Sign up to the newsletter: In Brief

Visit our Privacy Policy for more information about our services, how we may use, process and share your personal data, including information of your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.

Thank you for subscribing

View all newsletters from across the GlobalData Media network.

close